An analysis of the evidential use of German perception verbs

This paper presents a frame-theoretic account of the inferential and non-inferential use of German perception verbs like klingen ‘sound', aussehen ‘look (like)', and sich anfühlen ‘feel (like)'. We argue that a proper analysis of constructions based on these verbs requires explicit reference to object attributes like sound, sight, and touch, to which we refer as ‘dimensions'. It will be shown that a frame analysis, in which object dimensions can easily be represented as frame attributes, is ideally suited for the treatment of perception verbs of this type. Following Barsalou (1992), we define frames as recursive attribute-value structures, which are represented as directed labeled graphs with the arcs corresponding to attributes and the nodes to their values (cf. Petersen 2007). Furthermore, we assume that the knowledge about admissible frames is represented in type hierarchies which restrict the set of appropriate attributes and their values for object classes. Given our frame model, the admissible inferential and noninferential uses of perception verbs are captured as constraints on attributes assigned to the subject referent, the verb and the predicative complement of the verb. Finally, a comparison between the German data and verb-based evidentials in French will show that the inferential use of perception verbs exhibits marked differences cross-linguistically.

Keywords: perception verbs, inferential evidential, object dimensions, frame-theoretic analysis

References

Aikhenvald, A.Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barsalou, L.W. (1992). Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In A. Lehrer and E.F. Kittay (eds.), Frames, Fields, and Contrasts. Erlbaum: Hillsday.  pp. 21-74.

Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (1986). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Gisborne, N. (2010). The Event Structure of Perception Verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

de Haan, F. (1999). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18: 83–101.

Legendre, G. (1997). Secondary predication and functional projections in French. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15 (1): 1-45.

Levin, B. (1993).  English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Löbner, S. (2011). Concept Types and Determination.  Journal of Semantics 28: 279-333.

Petersen, W. (2007). Decomposing concepts with frames. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, Vol. 2: 151-170.

Viberg, Å., (1984). The verbs of perception: A typological study. In B. Butterworth (ed.),  Explanations for Language Universals. Berlin: Mouton.  pp. 123-162.

Viberg, Å. (2001).  Verbs of perception. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher and W. Raibl (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter.  pp. 1294-1309.

Whitt, R.J. (2009). Auditory evidentiality in English and German: The case of perception verbs.  Lingua 119: 1083-1095.

Whitt, R.J. (2010). Evidentiality and Perception Verbs in English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.

Willett, T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97.

Download

Download full text of the article as PDF