The English gerund vs. the to-infinitive: The case of aspectual constructions

The present paper is concerned with the complementation patterns of four aspectual verbs, i.e. begin, start, continue and cease, each of which co-occurs with two types of non-finite complementizers – the gerund and the to-infinitive. The paper analyses the distributional properties of each pair of the aspectual constructions (e.g. begin to do/ begin doing)  with the corpus-based method known as a distinctive collexeme analysis – a method geared specifically to investigating the interaction between syntactic constructions and lexemes which fill those constructions. The analysis shows that the pairs of constructions with the same matrix verb do not represent arbitrary alternations but are semantically motivated. The main aim of this contribution is to shed some new light on the schematic semantics of the gerundive and infinitival complements and thereby account for the motivated nature of their distribution.

Keywords: aspectual verbs, complementation, gerund, to-infinitive, distinctive collexeme analysis

References

Bolinger, D. (1968). Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa, 2 (2): 119–127.

Dirven, R. (1989). A cognitive perspective on complementation. In D. Jaspers et al. (eds.),Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon: Studies in Honour of Wim de Geest. Dordrecht – Holland/Providence – U.S.A.: Foris Publication.  pp. 113-139.

Duffley, P.J. (2006). The English Gerund-Participle: A Comparison with the Infinitive. Berkeley: Peter Lang Publishing.

Egan, T. (2008_. Non-finite Complementation: A usage-based Study of Infinitive and -ing Clauses in English. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

Gries, S. Th. and A. Stefanowitsch (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspectives on 'alternations'. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9 (1): 97–129.

Gries, S. Th. and A. Stefanowitsch (2010). Cluster analysis and the identification of collexeme classes. In J. Newman and S. Rice (eds.), Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research.  Stanford, CA: CSLI. pp. 73–90.

Kaleta, A. (2011). English non-finite complementizers in aspectual constructions: A distinctive collexeme analysis. Unpublished manuscript.

Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, volume II: Descriptive Applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. (2002). Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. 2nd edition. Berlin/New York. Mouton de Gruyter.

Pedersen, T. (1996). Fishing for exactness. Proceedings of the SCSUG 96 in Austin.  pp. 188–200.

Stefanowitsch, A. and S. Th. Gries (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (2): 43-209.

Taylor, J.R. (2002). Cognitive Grammar . Oxford: Oxford University Press

Traugott, E. (1992). Syntax. In R.M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 168–289.

Wierzbicka, A. (1988).  The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins

Download

Download full text of the article as PDF