Metaphorical Futures

This paper argues that temporal concepts that appear to involve a relation between an individual and a future event are not, as has often been claimed, directly structured in terms of locations in space and/or motion through space. Instead, the positioning of reified events in space is used to describe the degree of epistemic detachment holding between the individual and the event. This brings metaphorical means of conveying the future into line with recent work on tense and non-metaphorical means. It also shows parallels with the use of epistemic metaphors, such as UNDERSTANDING IS GRASPING, where the reified objects are ideas rather than events.

Keywords: temporal metaphors, ego-reference point, epistemic modality, Aymara

References

Allan, K. (2001). Natural Language Semantics. Oxford :Blackwell.

Ahrens, K. and C.R. Huang (2002). TIME PASSING IS MOTION. Language and Linguistics 3 (3): 491-519.

Barnden, J.A. (2008).  Metaphor and Artificial Intelligence.  In R.W. Gibbs (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  pp. 311-339.

Bybee, J. L., R. Perkins and W. Pagliuca (1994) The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect and modality in the language of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press..

Clark, H.H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T.E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language.  NewYork: Academic Press. pp. 27-63.

Dowty, D.R. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar.  Dordrecht: Reidel.

Evans, V. (2004). The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Fillmore, C. (1971/1997). Lectures on Deixis. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Huddleston, R. (1995).  The case against a future tense in English.  Studies in Language 19: 399-446.

Huddleston, R. and G. Pullum (2001).  The Cambridge Grammar of English Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jäkel, O. (1995). The metaphorical concept of mind: Mental activity is manipulation. In J. R. Taylor and R. E. MacLaury (eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World. Berlin: Mouton.  pp. 197-229.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd edition).  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 202-251.

Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980) (new edn. 2002). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought.  New York: Basic Books.

Ludlow, P. (1999). Semantics, Tense and Time: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Natural Language. MIT Press.

Mani, I., J. Pustejovsky and R. Gaizauskas (eds.) (2005). The Language of Time: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Moore, K. E. (2000). Spatial Experience and Temporal Metaphors in Wolof: Point of View, Conceptual Mapping, and Linguistic Practice.  Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.

Moore, Kevin. (2006). Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics 17. 199-244.

Núñez, R.E. and E. Sweetser (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30: 1-49.

Núñez, R.E, B. A. Motz, and U. Teuscher. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the Ego- and Time-Reference-Point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21 (3): 133-146.

Radden, G. (2003). The metaphor TIME AS SPACE across languages. In C.B.N. Baumgarten, M. Motz and J. Probst (ed.), Uebersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung: Das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen. Festschrift fuer Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag. Vol. Zeitschrift fuer Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 8 (2/3): 226-239.

Sarkar, A. (1998). The conflict between future tense and modality: The case of will in English, Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 5.2 : 91-117.

Steedman, M. (2005). The Productions of Time. Draft 5. Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh.

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, voI. l. Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Tenbrink, T. (2011). Reference frames of space and time in language. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 704–722.

Wallington, A.M., J.A. Barnden, S.R. Glasbey and M.G. Lee (2006).Metaphorical reasoning with an economical set of mappings. Delta 2, Especial: 147-171.

Wallington, A.M. (2010). Systematicity in metaphor and the use of invariant mappings. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan and L. Cameron (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.  pp. 209-244.

Zinken, J. (2010).  Temporal frames of reference. In P. Chilton and V. Evans (eds.), Language, Cognition, and Space. London: Equinox.  pp. 479-498.

Download

Download full text of the article as PDF